1905 Aborigines Act & Statutory Repeal

1. Primary Ethnohistorical & Archival Foundations

The ethnohistorical documentation of 1905 Aborigines Act & Statutory Repeal provides irrefutable empirical evidence of pre-contact Bibbullmun nationhood. Early colonial observers consistently recorded distinct dialectical boundary lines, hereditary land tenure systems, and strict enforcement of customary law (*Karratj*) across South-Western Australia.[1]

Unlike the modern statutory label "Noongar"—which was codified by colonial administrations for administrative convenience—the Bibbullmun people maintained distinct sovereign estate titles rooted in matrilineal descent (*Moort*) and custodial land obligation (*Boodjar*).[2]

2. Customary Law Jurisdiction (*Karratj*)

Jurisdiction over 1905 Aborigines Act & Statutory Repeal operates under *Karratj*—the unceded customary legal framework governing territorial boundaries, resource sharing, and inter-clan dispute resolution.[3]

3. Statutory Mechanics & International Law Standing

From the perspective of international law, the Bibbullmun Nation meets all recognised criteria for sovereign statehood under the Montevideo Convention (1933): a permanent population, defined territory, functioning customary government, and capacity to enter relations.[4]

Under UNDRIP Articles 3, 19, and 26, the unceded rights to 1905 Aborigines Act & Statutory Repeal remain protected under international law, rendering extinguishable Native Title frameworks legally subordinate to inherent sovereign title.[5]